Service points won folds the first and second serve into one number: of every point a player served, how many did they win. It is the single best summary of a serve, and the input most match-prediction models lean on hardest.
Because it is a whole-serve number it is hard to game: a player cannot inflate it by serving safe, the way they can inflate first-serve percentage. Pair it with return points won and the gap between the two is roughly what separates a top-ten player from a top-hundred one.
Jannik Sinner leads the ATP with 72.9% of service points won in 2026, measured over 47 qualifying matches — the most of any qualified ATP player this season. Taylor Fritz (71.4%) and Alexander Zverev (71.2%) are next. 89 ATP players qualify, and the median of that field is 64.6%.
| # | Player | Country | Service pts won % | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jannik Sinner | ITA | 72.9% | 47 |
| 2 | Taylor Fritz | USA | 71.4% | 39 |
| 3 | Alexander Zverev | GER | 71.2% | 63 |
| 4 | Ben Shelton | USA | 70.9% | 44 |
| 5 | Brandon Nakashima | USA | 68.8% | 41 |
| 6 | Felix Auger-Aliassime | CAN | 68.7% | 41 |
| 7 | Matteo Berrettini | ITA | 68.6% | 26 |
| 8 | Hubert Hurkacz | POL | 68.3% | 27 |
| 9 | Arthur Fils | FRA | 68.2% | 40 |
| 10 | Valentin Vacherot | MON | 68.0% | 24 |
| 11 | Alexander Blockx | BEL | 68.0% | 25 |
| 12 | Arthur Rinderknech | FRA | 67.8% | 27 |
| 13 | Carlos Alcaraz | ESP | 67.6% | 30 |
| 14 | Alexander Bublik | KAZ | 67.4% | 28 |
| 15 | Karen Khachanov | — | 67.4% | 37 |
| 16 | Thiago Agustin Tirante | ARG | 67.4% | 28 |
| 17 | Novak Djokovic | SRB | 67.3% | 21 |
| 18 | Alejandro Tabilo | CHI | 66.9% | 33 |
| 19 | Tommy Paul | USA | 66.8% | 43 |
| 20 | Stefanos Tsitsipas | GRE | 66.6% | 33 |
| 21 | Terence Atmane | FRA | 66.6% | 31 |
| 22 | Alexei Popyrin | AUS | 66.4% | 21 |
| 23 | Nuno Borges | POR | 66.3% | 28 |
| 24 | Jakub Mensik | CZE | 66.2% | 41 |
| 25 | Casper Ruud | NOR | 66.2% | 31 |
| 26 | Jiri Lehecka | CZE | 66.2% | 39 |
| 27 | Tomas Martin Etcheverry | ARG | 66.2% | 33 |
| 28 | Tallon Griekspoor | NED | 66.0% | 21 |
| 29 | Joao Fonseca | BRA | 65.8% | 30 |
| 30 | Frances Tiafoe | USA | 65.7% | 49 |
| 31 | Alex Michelsen | USA | 65.7% | 32 |
| 32 | Yannick Hanfmann | GER | 65.6% | 22 |
| 33 | Jaume Munar | ESP | 65.6% | 16 |
| 34 | Ugo Humbert | FRA | 65.5% | 32 |
| 35 | Raphael Collignon | BEL | 65.4% | 15 |
| 36 | Quentin Halys | FRA | 65.4% | 21 |
| 37 | Marin Cilic | CRO | 65.4% | 22 |
| 38 | Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | ESP | 65.3% | 27 |
| 39 | Aleksandar Kovacevic | USA | 65.3% | 21 |
| 40 | Andrey Rublev | — | 65.0% | 35 |
| 41 | Ethan Quinn | USA | 65.0% | 19 |
| 42 | Lorenzo Sonego | ITA | 64.9% | 15 |
| 43 | Daniil Medvedev | — | 64.7% | 41 |
| 44 | Miomir Kecmanovic | SRB | 64.7% | 24 |
| 45 | Dino Prizmic | CRO | 64.6% | 18 |
| 46 | Jan-Lennard Struff | GER | 64.0% | 23 |
| 47 | Alex De Minaur | AUS | 63.5% | 43 |
| 48 | Zachary Svajda | USA | 63.5% | 21 |
| 49 | Hamad Medjedovic | SRB | 63.4% | 19 |
| 50 | Denis Shapovalov | CAN | 63.3% | 27 |
39 further qualified ATP players are outside the top 50; the full field is sortable in the ATP stat explorer on Stat Leaders.
Aryna Sabalenka leads the WTA with 64.5% of service points won in 2026, measured over 54 qualifying matches — the most of any qualified WTA player this season. Elena Rybakina (64.3%) and Karolina Muchova (63.3%) are next. 80 WTA players qualify, and the median of that field is 57.1%.
| # | Player | Country | Service pts won % | Matches |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Aryna Sabalenka | — | 64.5% | 54 |
| 2 | Elena Rybakina | KAZ | 64.3% | 61 |
| 3 | Karolina Muchova | CZE | 63.3% | 43 |
| 4 | Linda Noskova | CZE | 63.0% | 45 |
| 5 | Naomi Osaka | JPN | 62.4% | 37 |
| 6 | Jessica Pegula | USA | 62.2% | 63 |
| 7 | Iga Swiatek | POL | 61.4% | 44 |
| 8 | Qinwen Zheng | CHN | 61.2% | 22 |
| 9 | Madison Keys | USA | 61.1% | 39 |
| 10 | Hailey Baptiste | USA | 61.0% | 22 |
| 11 | Mirra Andreeva | — | 60.7% | 58 |
| 12 | Taylor Townsend | USA | 60.7% | 21 |
| 13 | Marta Kostyuk | UKR | 60.6% | 40 |
| 14 | Belinda Bencic | SUI | 60.4% | 32 |
| 15 | Victoria Mboko | CAN | 60.1% | 29 |
| 16 | Amanda Anisimova | USA | 59.6% | 33 |
| 17 | Ann Li | USA | 59.6% | 31 |
| 18 | Clara Tauson | DEN | 59.6% | 28 |
| 19 | Coco Gauff | USA | 59.3% | 56 |
| 20 | Iva Jovic | USA | 59.0% | 42 |
| 21 | Sorana Cirstea | ROU | 59.0% | 36 |
| 22 | Diane Parry | FRA | 58.9% | 25 |
| 23 | Elina Svitolina | UKR | 58.7% | 51 |
| 24 | Elise Mertens | BEL | 58.7% | 39 |
| 25 | Maria Sakkari | GRE | 58.7% | 28 |
| 26 | Donna Vekic | CRO | 58.6% | 21 |
| 27 | Diana Shnaider | — | 58.2% | 43 |
| 28 | Xinyu Wang | CHN | 58.1% | 28 |
| 29 | Emma Navarro | USA | 58.0% | 31 |
| 30 | Peyton Stearns | USA | 57.9% | 27 |
| 31 | Janice Tjen | INA | 57.8% | 24 |
| 32 | Leylah Fernandez | CAN | 57.7% | 35 |
| 33 | Ashlyn Krueger | USA | 57.6% | 18 |
| 34 | Maja Chwalinska | POL | 57.5% | 17 |
| 35 | Ekaterina Alexandrova | — | 57.5% | 34 |
| 36 | Nikola Bartunkova | CZE | 57.5% | 25 |
| 37 | Sofia Kenin | USA | 57.5% | 18 |
| 38 | Elisabetta Cocciaretto | ITA | 57.4% | 19 |
| 39 | Liudmila Samsonova | — | 57.3% | 36 |
| 40 | Karolina Pliskova | CZE | 57.3% | 24 |
| 41 | Talia Gibson | AUS | 57.0% | 27 |
| 42 | Magda Linette | POL | 57.0% | 22 |
| 43 | Sloane Stephens | USA | 57.0% | 15 |
| 44 | Elena Gabriela Ruse | ROU | 56.9% | 23 |
| 45 | Alexandra Eala | PHI | 56.7% | 44 |
| 46 | Jasmine Paolini | ITA | 56.7% | 28 |
| 47 | Katerina Siniakova | CZE | 56.6% | 29 |
| 48 | Marie Bouzkova | CZE | 56.5% | 28 |
| 49 | Anna Kalinskaya | — | 56.3% | 40 |
| 50 | Sara Bejlek | CZE | 56.3% | 22 |
30 further qualified WTA players are outside the top 50; the full field is sortable in the WTA stat explorer on Stat Leaders.
Service points won is total points won on serve divided by total points served, expressed as a percentage — first and second serve combined.
A player qualifies for this board with at least 15 singles matches in the 2026 pool and at least 15 of those matches carrying this statistic. The floor is half the busiest schedule on tour, capped at 15 — a flat 15 would leave the board empty until roughly April, when the pool has barely filled. The Matches column on every row is that player's own denominator, so a number taken over a thin sample is visible as one rather than hidden behind a rank. A tour section is withheld entirely below 25 qualified players.
Figures cover Grand Slam, 1000- and 500-level singles matches in 2026, on every surface. 250-level and lower-tier events are not counted, so a player's totals here run below their full-season numbers — which is also why this page ranks a per-match or per-point RATE rather than a season total. A total drawn from a partial pool would be wrong in a way a rate is not.
Service points won is available for every match carrying serve statistics, which makes it the densest of the rate boards. In the 2026 pool this statistic is recorded for 2,958 of the 3,040 ATP matches (97%) and 2,922 of the 3,298 WTA matches (89%).
Ranks and values on this page are computed over the same pool, so the ordering and the numbers beside it always agree. Drop Shot is not the ATP or the WTA and these are not official tour statistics: they are aggregated from our own match feed, and where a match did not report a statistic it contributes nothing to either the numerator or the denominator.