ATP & WTA Service Points Won Leaders 2026

Service points won folds the first and second serve into one number: of every point a player served, how many did they win. It is the single best summary of a serve, and the input most match-prediction models lean on hardest.

Because it is a whole-serve number it is hard to game: a player cannot inflate it by serving safe, the way they can inflate first-serve percentage. Pair it with return points won and the gap between the two is roughly what separates a top-ten player from a top-hundred one.

ATP service points won leaders 2026

Jannik Sinner leads the ATP with 72.9% of service points won in 2026, measured over 47 qualifying matches — the most of any qualified ATP player this season. Taylor Fritz (71.4%) and Alexander Zverev (71.2%) are next. 89 ATP players qualify, and the median of that field is 64.6%.

ATP service points won leaders, 2026 season — top 50 of 89 qualified players, ranked by service pts won %, with the match sample behind each figure.
#PlayerCountryService pts won %Matches
1Jannik SinnerITA72.9%47
2Taylor FritzUSA71.4%39
3Alexander ZverevGER71.2%63
4Ben SheltonUSA70.9%44
5Brandon NakashimaUSA68.8%41
6Felix Auger-AliassimeCAN68.7%41
7Matteo BerrettiniITA68.6%26
8Hubert HurkaczPOL68.3%27
9Arthur FilsFRA68.2%40
10Valentin VacherotMON68.0%24
11Alexander BlockxBEL68.0%25
12Arthur RinderknechFRA67.8%27
13Carlos AlcarazESP67.6%30
14Alexander BublikKAZ67.4%28
15Karen Khachanov—67.4%37
16Thiago Agustin TiranteARG67.4%28
17Novak DjokovicSRB67.3%21
18Alejandro TabiloCHI66.9%33
19Tommy PaulUSA66.8%43
20Stefanos TsitsipasGRE66.6%33
21Terence AtmaneFRA66.6%31
22Alexei PopyrinAUS66.4%21
23Nuno BorgesPOR66.3%28
24Jakub MensikCZE66.2%41
25Casper RuudNOR66.2%31
26Jiri LeheckaCZE66.2%39
27Tomas Martin EtcheverryARG66.2%33
28Tallon GriekspoorNED66.0%21
29Joao FonsecaBRA65.8%30
30Frances TiafoeUSA65.7%49
31Alex MichelsenUSA65.7%32
32Yannick HanfmannGER65.6%22
33Jaume MunarESP65.6%16
34Ugo HumbertFRA65.5%32
35Raphael CollignonBEL65.4%15
36Quentin HalysFRA65.4%21
37Marin CilicCRO65.4%22
38Alejandro Davidovich FokinaESP65.3%27
39Aleksandar KovacevicUSA65.3%21
40Andrey Rublev—65.0%35
41Ethan QuinnUSA65.0%19
42Lorenzo SonegoITA64.9%15
43Daniil Medvedev—64.7%41
44Miomir KecmanovicSRB64.7%24
45Dino PrizmicCRO64.6%18
46Jan-Lennard StruffGER64.0%23
47Alex De MinaurAUS63.5%43
48Zachary SvajdaUSA63.5%21
49Hamad MedjedovicSRB63.4%19
50Denis ShapovalovCAN63.3%27

39 further qualified ATP players are outside the top 50; the full field is sortable in the ATP stat explorer on Stat Leaders.

WTA service points won leaders 2026

Aryna Sabalenka leads the WTA with 64.5% of service points won in 2026, measured over 54 qualifying matches — the most of any qualified WTA player this season. Elena Rybakina (64.3%) and Karolina Muchova (63.3%) are next. 80 WTA players qualify, and the median of that field is 57.1%.

WTA service points won leaders, 2026 season — top 50 of 80 qualified players, ranked by service pts won %, with the match sample behind each figure.
#PlayerCountryService pts won %Matches
1Aryna Sabalenka—64.5%54
2Elena RybakinaKAZ64.3%61
3Karolina MuchovaCZE63.3%43
4Linda NoskovaCZE63.0%45
5Naomi OsakaJPN62.4%37
6Jessica PegulaUSA62.2%63
7Iga SwiatekPOL61.4%44
8Qinwen ZhengCHN61.2%22
9Madison KeysUSA61.1%39
10Hailey BaptisteUSA61.0%22
11Mirra Andreeva—60.7%58
12Taylor TownsendUSA60.7%21
13Marta KostyukUKR60.6%40
14Belinda BencicSUI60.4%32
15Victoria MbokoCAN60.1%29
16Amanda AnisimovaUSA59.6%33
17Ann LiUSA59.6%31
18Clara TausonDEN59.6%28
19Coco GauffUSA59.3%56
20Iva JovicUSA59.0%42
21Sorana CirsteaROU59.0%36
22Diane ParryFRA58.9%25
23Elina SvitolinaUKR58.7%51
24Elise MertensBEL58.7%39
25Maria SakkariGRE58.7%28
26Donna VekicCRO58.6%21
27Diana Shnaider—58.2%43
28Xinyu WangCHN58.1%28
29Emma NavarroUSA58.0%31
30Peyton StearnsUSA57.9%27
31Janice TjenINA57.8%24
32Leylah FernandezCAN57.7%35
33Ashlyn KruegerUSA57.6%18
34Maja ChwalinskaPOL57.5%17
35Ekaterina Alexandrova—57.5%34
36Nikola BartunkovaCZE57.5%25
37Sofia KeninUSA57.5%18
38Elisabetta CocciarettoITA57.4%19
39Liudmila Samsonova—57.3%36
40Karolina PliskovaCZE57.3%24
41Talia GibsonAUS57.0%27
42Magda LinettePOL57.0%22
43Sloane StephensUSA57.0%15
44Elena Gabriela RuseROU56.9%23
45Alexandra EalaPHI56.7%44
46Jasmine PaoliniITA56.7%28
47Katerina SiniakovaCZE56.6%29
48Marie BouzkovaCZE56.5%28
49Anna Kalinskaya—56.3%40
50Sara BejlekCZE56.3%22

30 further qualified WTA players are outside the top 50; the full field is sortable in the WTA stat explorer on Stat Leaders.

How service points won is measured

Service points won is total points won on serve divided by total points served, expressed as a percentage — first and second serve combined.

A player qualifies for this board with at least 15 singles matches in the 2026 pool and at least 15 of those matches carrying this statistic. The floor is half the busiest schedule on tour, capped at 15 — a flat 15 would leave the board empty until roughly April, when the pool has barely filled. The Matches column on every row is that player's own denominator, so a number taken over a thin sample is visible as one rather than hidden behind a rank. A tour section is withheld entirely below 25 qualified players.

Coverage and limits

Figures cover Grand Slam, 1000- and 500-level singles matches in 2026, on every surface. 250-level and lower-tier events are not counted, so a player's totals here run below their full-season numbers — which is also why this page ranks a per-match or per-point RATE rather than a season total. A total drawn from a partial pool would be wrong in a way a rate is not.

Service points won is available for every match carrying serve statistics, which makes it the densest of the rate boards. In the 2026 pool this statistic is recorded for 2,958 of the 3,040 ATP matches (97%) and 2,922 of the 3,298 WTA matches (89%).

Ranks and values on this page are computed over the same pool, so the ordering and the numbers beside it always agree. Drop Shot is not the ATP or the WTA and these are not official tour statistics: they are aggregated from our own match feed, and where a match did not report a statistic it contributes nothing to either the numerator or the denominator.