ATP & WTA Second-Serve Return Points Won Leaders 2026

Second-serve return points won is the share of points a player wins against the opponent's second serve — the ball a returner is supposed to attack.

This is the aggression board. A player over the halfway mark is winning more second-serve return points than they lose, which is the pressure that forces double faults out of an opponent and turns 30-30 into break point. Read it beside the break-points-converted board: the players who lead one usually lead the other.

ATP second-serve return points won leaders 2026

Daniel Merida Aguilar leads the ATP with 55.7% of second-serve return points won in 2026, measured over 19 qualifying matches — the most of any qualified ATP player this season. Jannik Sinner (54.1%) and Carlos Alcaraz (53.7%) are next. 89 ATP players qualify, and the median of that field is 49.0%.

ATP second-serve return points won leaders, 2026 season — top 50 of 89 qualified players, ranked by 2nd return won %, with the match sample behind each figure.
#PlayerCountry2nd return won %Matches
1Daniel Merida AguilarESP55.7%19
2Jannik SinnerITA54.1%47
3Carlos AlcarazESP53.7%30
4Frances TiafoeUSA53.6%49
5Francisco CerundoloARG53.6%37
6Daniil Medvedev—53.4%41
7Sebastian BaezARG53.3%19
8Alex De MinaurAUS53.2%43
9Lorenzo MusettiITA52.8%26
10Pablo Carreno BustaESP52.8%17
11Learner TienUSA52.3%34
12Joao FonsecaBRA52.1%30
13Jan-Lennard StruffGER51.8%23
14Arthur FilsFRA51.6%40
15Novak DjokovicSRB51.6%21
16Alex MichelsenUSA51.5%32
17Alexander ZverevGER51.4%63
18Rinky HijikataAUS51.4%18
19Marin CilicCRO51.3%22
20Kamil MajchrzakPOL51.2%20
21Miomir KecmanovicSRB51.1%24
22Ignacio BusePER51.0%23
23Jaume MunarESP51.0%16
24Valentin RoyerFRA51.0%17
25Brandon NakashimaUSA50.9%41
26Mariano NavoneARG50.9%21
27Corentin MoutetFRA50.7%20
28Martin LandaluceESP50.7%20
29Mattia BellucciITA50.7%19
30Rafael JodarESP50.6%44
31Karen Khachanov—50.6%37
32Tommy PaulUSA50.5%43
33Botic Van De ZandschulpNED50.5%29
34Adrian MannarinoFRA50.5%21
35Jenson BrooksbyUSA50.5%21
36Taylor FritzUSA50.3%39
37Casper RuudNOR50.2%31
38Alejandro Davidovich FokinaESP49.8%27
39Denis ShapovalovCAN49.8%27
40Ugo HumbertFRA49.7%32
41Dino PrizmicCRO49.6%18
42Juan Manuel CerundoloARG49.4%21
43Valentin VacherotMON49.2%24
44Quentin HalysFRA49.2%21
45Vit KoprivaCZE49.0%25
46Flavio CobolliITA48.9%44
47Alejandro TabiloCHI48.9%33
48Jaime FariaPOR48.9%19
49Cameron NorrieGBR48.7%29
50Stefanos TsitsipasGRE48.7%33

39 further qualified ATP players are outside the top 50; the full field is sortable in the ATP stat explorer on Stat Leaders.

WTA second-serve return points won leaders 2026

Kamilla Rakhimova leads the WTA with 60.4% of second-serve return points won in 2026, measured over 21 qualifying matches — the most of any qualified WTA player this season. Elina Svitolina (60.0%) and Iga Swiatek (59.8%) are next. 80 WTA players qualify, and the median of that field is 54.4%.

WTA second-serve return points won leaders, 2026 season — top 50 of 80 qualified players, ranked by 2nd return won %, with the match sample behind each figure.
#PlayerCountry2nd return won %Matches
1Kamilla RakhimovaUZB60.4%21
2Elina SvitolinaUKR60.0%51
3Iga SwiatekPOL59.8%44
4Amanda AnisimovaUSA59.7%33
5Belinda BencicSUI59.2%32
6Marta KostyukUKR58.7%40
7Zeynep SonmezTUR58.4%27
8Mirra Andreeva—58.1%58
9Jessica Bouzas ManeiroESP58.1%17
10Viktorija GolubicSUI58.0%18
11Anastasia PotapovaAUT57.7%34
12Aryna Sabalenka—57.4%54
13Iva JovicUSA57.4%42
14Alexandra EalaPHI57.1%44
15Anna BondarHUN56.7%21
16Daria KasatkinaAUS56.7%20
17Jelena OstapenkoLAT56.6%31
18Eva LysGER56.6%17
19Nikola BartunkovaCZE56.4%25
20Elena Gabriela RuseROU56.4%23
21Elise MertensBEL56.2%39
22Camila OsorioCOL56.2%21
23Coco GauffUSA56.1%56
24Tereza ValentovaCZE56.1%17
25Peyton StearnsUSA56.0%27
26Diana Shnaider—55.9%43
27Sorana CirsteaROU55.8%36
28Maja ChwalinskaPOL55.6%17
29Marie BouzkovaCZE55.5%28
30Oleksandra OliynykovaUKR55.5%21
31Jessica PegulaUSA55.4%63
32Yuliia StarodubtsevaUKR55.4%25
33Anna Kalinskaya—55.3%40
34Yulia PutintsevaKAZ55.3%21
35Liudmila Samsonova—55.2%36
36Madison KeysUSA54.8%39
37Magdalena FrechPOL54.7%32
38Sara BejlekCZE54.5%22
39Maya JointAUS54.5%17
40Elena RybakinaKAZ54.4%61
41Shuai ZhangCHN54.4%24
42Caty McNallyUSA54.4%23
43Sofia KeninUSA54.2%18
44Clara TausonDEN54.1%28
45McCartney KesslerUSA54.1%18
46Jasmine PaoliniITA54.0%28
47Maria SakkariGRE54.0%28
48Elisabetta CocciarettoITA54.0%19
49Victoria MbokoCAN53.9%29
50Naomi OsakaJPN53.9%37

30 further qualified WTA players are outside the top 50; the full field is sortable in the WTA stat explorer on Stat Leaders.

How second-serve return points won is measured

Second-serve return points won is total points won returning a second serve divided by total second serves faced, expressed as a percentage.

A player qualifies for this board with at least 15 singles matches in the 2026 pool and at least 15 of those matches carrying this statistic. The floor is half the busiest schedule on tour, capped at 15 — a flat 15 would leave the board empty until roughly April, when the pool has barely filled. The Matches column on every row is that player's own denominator, so a number taken over a thin sample is visible as one rather than hidden behind a rank. A tour section is withheld entirely below 25 qualified players.

Coverage and limits

Figures cover Grand Slam, 1000- and 500-level singles matches in 2026, on every surface. 250-level and lower-tier events are not counted, so a player's totals here run below their full-season numbers — which is also why this page ranks a per-match or per-point RATE rather than a season total. A total drawn from a partial pool would be wrong in a way a rate is not.

Shares its source with the first-serve return board, so the two cover the same matches. In the 2026 pool this statistic is recorded for 2,958 of the 3,040 ATP matches (97%) and 2,922 of the 3,298 WTA matches (89%).

Ranks and values on this page are computed over the same pool, so the ordering and the numbers beside it always agree. Drop Shot is not the ATP or the WTA and these are not official tour statistics: they are aggregated from our own match feed, and where a match did not report a statistic it contributes nothing to either the numerator or the denominator.