The winners-to-unforced-errors ratio divides the points a player ends outright by the points they hand over. Above 1.00 means more winners than unforced errors.
This is the efficiency read the raw winners board is missing: a player can lead in winners and still be losing, if the errors came at the same rate. A ratio over 1.00 means more winners than unforced errors across the season, which the tour median does not reach — so read the median printed under the table as the benchmark rather than assuming 1.00 is average. The same scorer-judgement caveat applies as on the winners board.
Jannik Sinner leads the ATP with 1.34 winners for every unforced error in 2026, measured over 47 qualifying matches — the most of any qualified ATP player this season. Taylor Fritz (1.31) and Jaume Munar (1.28) are next. 87 ATP players qualify, and the median of that field is 0.91.
37 further qualified ATP players are outside the top 50; the full field is sortable in the ATP stat explorer on Stat Leaders.
There is no WTA table here, and the reason is data rather than tennis: only 30% of the WTA matches in the qualifying pool carry this statistic at all. A leaderboard built on that would rank players by which events happened to record the number, not by how they played, so it is withheld.
The ratio is total winners divided by total unforced errors — a ratio of season totals, not an average of per-match ratios.
A player qualifies for this board with at least 15 singles matches in the 2026 pool and at least 15 of those matches carrying this statistic. The floor is half the busiest schedule on tour, capped at 15 — a flat 15 would leave the board empty until roughly April, when the pool has barely filled. The Matches column on every row is that player's own denominator, so a number taken over a thin sample is visible as one rather than hidden behind a rank. A tour section is withheld entirely below 25 qualified players.
Figures cover Grand Slam, 1000- and 500-level singles matches in 2026, on every surface. 250-level and lower-tier events are not counted, so a player's totals here run below their full-season numbers — which is also why this page ranks a per-match or per-point RATE rather than a season total. A total drawn from a partial pool would be wrong in a way a rate is not.
Both halves of this ratio are scorer-judged rather than scoreboard-derived, and the two are recorded independently: a match logged for winners but not for unforced errors feeds the numerator without feeding the denominator. Read the ratio beside the sample count on each row rather than on its own. In the 2026 pool this statistic is recorded for 2,797 of the 3,040 ATP matches (92%).
Ranks and values on this page are computed over the same pool, so the ordering and the numbers beside it always agree. Drop Shot is not the ATP or the WTA and these are not official tour statistics: they are aggregated from our own match feed, and where a match did not report a statistic it contributes nothing to either the numerator or the denominator.