ATP & WTA First-Serve Points Won Leaders 2026

First-serve points won is the share of points a player wins when their first serve goes in. It is the cleanest single measure of how much damage a first serve actually does, because it counts the whole point, not just the aces.

This is the stat that separates a big serve from an effective one. A player can win a point outright with an ace, with a serve-plus-one forehand, or by simply starting the rally ahead — all three land here. The very top of this board is usually the same short list as the top of the rankings, which is exactly why it is worth reading.

ATP first-serve points won leaders 2026

Jannik Sinner leads the ATP with 80.7% of first-serve points won in 2026, measured over 47 qualifying matches — the most of any qualified ATP player this season. Taylor Fritz (79.8%) and Hubert Hurkacz (79.4%) are next. 89 ATP players qualify, and the median of that field is 72.7%.

ATP first-serve points won leaders, 2026 season — top 50 of 89 qualified players, ranked by 1st serve won %, with the match sample behind each figure.
#PlayerCountry1st serve won %Matches
1Jannik SinnerITA80.7%47
2Taylor FritzUSA79.8%39
3Hubert HurkaczPOL79.4%27
4Brandon NakashimaUSA78.7%41
5Valentin VacherotMON78.5%24
6Alexander BlockxBEL78.4%25
7Jakub MensikCZE78.3%41
8Marin CilicCRO78.1%22
9Matteo BerrettiniITA77.8%26
10Felix Auger-AliassimeCAN77.5%41
11Ben SheltonUSA77.3%44
12Quentin HalysFRA77.3%21
13Alexander ZverevGER77.2%63
14Arthur RinderknechFRA77.2%27
15Thiago Agustin TiranteARG76.9%28
16Alexander BublikKAZ76.7%28
17Stefanos TsitsipasGRE76.6%33
18Aleksandar KovacevicUSA76.3%21
19Terence AtmaneFRA75.8%31
20Raphael CollignonBEL75.7%15
21Jan-Lennard StruffGER75.6%23
22Yannick HanfmannGER75.3%22
23Alejandro TabiloCHI75.1%33
24Ugo HumbertFRA75.1%32
25Arthur FilsFRA74.9%40
26Karen Khachanov—74.9%37
27Nuno BorgesPOR74.8%28
28Frances TiafoeUSA74.7%49
29Tommy PaulUSA74.7%43
30Ethan QuinnUSA74.7%19
31Jaume MunarESP74.5%16
32Botic Van De ZandschulpNED74.4%29
33Jiri LeheckaCZE74.2%39
34Daniil Medvedev—74.1%41
35Alex MichelsenUSA74.1%32
36Novak DjokovicSRB74.0%21
37Andrey Rublev—73.9%35
38Zizou BergsBEL73.8%28
39Tallon GriekspoorNED73.7%21
40Zachary SvajdaUSA73.7%21
41Denis ShapovalovCAN73.3%27
42Alexei PopyrinAUS73.1%21
43James DuckworthAUS72.9%16
44Carlos AlcarazESP72.7%30
45Tomas Martin EtcheverryARG72.7%33
46Jaime FariaPOR72.4%19
47Flavio CobolliITA72.1%44
48Dino PrizmicCRO72.0%18
49Miomir KecmanovicSRB71.9%24
50Lorenzo SonegoITA71.8%15

39 further qualified ATP players are outside the top 50; the full field is sortable in the ATP stat explorer on Stat Leaders.

WTA first-serve points won leaders 2026

Elena Rybakina leads the WTA with 74.0% of first-serve points won in 2026, measured over 61 qualifying matches — the most of any qualified WTA player this season. Qinwen Zheng (73.9%) and Linda Noskova (73.1%) are next. 80 WTA players qualify, and the median of that field is 65.2%.

WTA first-serve points won leaders, 2026 season — top 50 of 80 qualified players, ranked by 1st serve won %, with the match sample behind each figure.
#PlayerCountry1st serve won %Matches
1Elena RybakinaKAZ74.0%61
2Qinwen ZhengCHN73.9%22
3Linda NoskovaCZE73.1%45
4Naomi OsakaJPN72.0%37
5Marta KostyukUKR70.9%40
6Aryna Sabalenka—70.8%54
7Karolina MuchovaCZE70.6%43
8Clara TausonDEN69.6%28
9Jessica PegulaUSA69.5%63
10Madison KeysUSA69.4%39
11Diane ParryFRA69.3%25
12Ann LiUSA69.0%31
13Elise MertensBEL68.6%39
14Nikola BartunkovaCZE68.5%25
15Coco GauffUSA68.4%56
16Hailey BaptisteUSA68.4%22
17Alycia ParksUSA68.0%27
18Emma NavarroUSA67.9%31
19Donna VekicCRO67.8%21
20Mirra Andreeva—67.6%58
21Taylor TownsendUSA67.5%21
22Iga SwiatekPOL67.1%44
23Paula BadosaESP67.1%16
24Elina SvitolinaUKR67.0%51
25Janice TjenINA66.9%24
26Talia GibsonAUS66.6%27
27Victoria MbokoCAN66.5%29
28Sorana CirsteaROU66.5%36
29Jelena OstapenkoLAT66.5%31
30Peyton StearnsUSA66.5%27
31Belinda BencicSUI66.4%32
32Amanda AnisimovaUSA66.2%33
33Ekaterina Alexandrova—66.2%34
34Xinyu WangCHN66.1%28
35Liudmila Samsonova—66.1%36
36Ashlyn KruegerUSA65.8%18
37Iva JovicUSA65.4%42
38Katie BoulterGBR65.3%21
39Anastasia PotapovaAUT65.2%34
40Karolina PliskovaCZE65.2%24
41Magda LinettePOL65.2%22
42Elena Gabriela RuseROU64.8%23
43Maria SakkariGRE64.6%28
44Leylah FernandezCAN64.4%35
45Sofia KeninUSA64.3%18
46Elisabetta CocciarettoITA63.9%19
47Tatjana MariaGER63.7%15
48Anna Kalinskaya—63.3%40
49Diana Shnaider—63.1%43
50Magdalena FrechPOL63.0%32

30 further qualified WTA players are outside the top 50; the full field is sortable in the WTA stat explorer on Stat Leaders.

How first-serve points won is measured

First-serve points won is total points won behind a first serve divided by total first serves in, expressed as a percentage.

A player qualifies for this board with at least 15 singles matches in the 2026 pool and at least 15 of those matches carrying this statistic. The floor is half the busiest schedule on tour, capped at 15 — a flat 15 would leave the board empty until roughly April, when the pool has barely filled. The Matches column on every row is that player's own denominator, so a number taken over a thin sample is visible as one rather than hidden behind a rank. A tour section is withheld entirely below 25 qualified players.

Coverage and limits

Figures cover Grand Slam, 1000- and 500-level singles matches in 2026, on every surface. 250-level and lower-tier events are not counted, so a player's totals here run below their full-season numbers — which is also why this page ranks a per-match or per-point RATE rather than a season total. A total drawn from a partial pool would be wrong in a way a rate is not.

Serve-point splits are recorded alongside the scoreboard statistics for the great majority of tour-level matches. In the 2026 pool this statistic is recorded for 2,958 of the 3,040 ATP matches (97%) and 2,922 of the 3,298 WTA matches (89%).

Ranks and values on this page are computed over the same pool, so the ordering and the numbers beside it always agree. Drop Shot is not the ATP or the WTA and these are not official tour statistics: they are aggregated from our own match feed, and where a match did not report a statistic it contributes nothing to either the numerator or the denominator.