ATP & WTA Second-Serve Points Won Leaders 2026

Second-serve points won is the share of points a player wins after missing their first serve. It is the most exposed position in tennis: the returner knows a safer ball is coming and steps in.

Second-serve points won correlates with hold percentage more tightly than raw serve speed does, because every service game a player is broken in ran through a second serve somewhere. Players near the top of this board either hit a genuinely aggressive second ball or defend the rally that follows it unusually well.

ATP second-serve points won leaders 2026

Jannik Sinner leads the ATP with 58.7% of second-serve points won in 2026, measured over 47 qualifying matches — the most of any qualified ATP player this season. Ben Shelton (57.6%) and Carlos Alcaraz (57.3%) are next. 89 ATP players qualify, and the median of that field is 50.8%.

ATP second-serve points won leaders, 2026 season — top 50 of 89 qualified players, ranked by 2nd serve won %, with the match sample behind each figure.
#PlayerCountry2nd serve won %Matches
1Jannik SinnerITA58.7%47
2Ben SheltonUSA57.6%44
3Carlos AlcarazESP57.3%30
4Joao FonsecaBRA56.8%30
5Alexander ZverevGER56.6%63
6Arthur FilsFRA56.4%40
7Casper RuudNOR56.2%31
8Thiago Agustin TiranteARG55.1%28
9Taylor FritzUSA55.0%39
10Tommy PaulUSA54.9%43
11Tomas Martin EtcheverryARG54.9%33
12Alex De MinaurAUS54.4%43
13Alexei PopyrinAUS54.4%21
14Karen Khachanov—54.2%37
15Dino PrizmicCRO53.9%18
16Alejandro Davidovich FokinaESP53.8%27
17Pablo Carreno BustaESP53.7%17
18Novak DjokovicSRB53.6%21
19Tallon GriekspoorNED53.5%21
20Frances TiafoeUSA53.1%49
21Miomir KecmanovicSRB53.1%24
22Alejandro TabiloCHI52.9%33
23Alexander BlockxBEL52.8%25
24Arthur FeryGBR52.8%16
25Mariano NavoneARG52.7%21
26Rafael JodarESP52.5%44
27Lorenzo MusettiITA52.4%26
28Juan Manuel CerundoloARG52.3%21
29Cameron NorrieGBR52.2%29
30Ugo HumbertFRA52.1%32
31Fabian MarozsanHUN52.0%24
32Flavio CobolliITA51.9%44
33Jiri LeheckaCZE51.9%39
34Terence AtmaneFRA51.8%31
35Stefanos TsitsipasGRE51.7%33
36Matteo BerrettiniITA51.7%26
37Jaume MunarESP51.6%16
38Arthur RinderknechFRA51.4%27
39Alex MichelsenUSA51.4%32
40Luciano DarderiITA51.2%32
41Martin LandaluceESP51.1%20
42Francisco CerundoloARG50.9%37
43Jaime FariaPOR50.9%19
44Jenson BrooksbyUSA50.9%21
45Felix Auger-AliassimeCAN50.8%41
46Alexander BublikKAZ50.8%28
47Nuno BorgesPOR50.7%28
48James DuckworthAUS50.7%16
49Andrey Rublev—50.6%35
50Rinky HijikataAUS50.6%18

39 further qualified ATP players are outside the top 50; the full field is sortable in the ATP stat explorer on Stat Leaders.

WTA second-serve points won leaders 2026

Aryna Sabalenka leads the WTA with 53.4% of second-serve points won in 2026, measured over 54 qualifying matches — the most of any qualified WTA player this season. Yuliia Starodubtseva (52.0%) and Hailey Baptiste (51.5%) are next. 80 WTA players qualify, and the median of that field is 45.9%.

WTA second-serve points won leaders, 2026 season — top 50 of 80 qualified players, ranked by 2nd serve won %, with the match sample behind each figure.
#PlayerCountry2nd serve won %Matches
1Aryna Sabalenka—53.4%54
2Yuliia StarodubtsevaUKR52.0%25
3Hailey BaptisteUSA51.5%22
4Elena RybakinaKAZ51.4%61
5Karolina MuchovaCZE50.7%43
6Iga SwiatekPOL50.2%44
7Jessica PegulaUSA50.1%63
8Belinda BencicSUI50.0%32
9Iva JovicUSA49.6%42
10Maja ChwalinskaPOL49.5%17
11Maria SakkariGRE49.3%28
12Diana Shnaider—48.8%43
13Naomi OsakaJPN48.8%37
14Mirra Andreeva—48.7%58
15Sloane StephensUSA48.7%15
16Alexandra EalaPHI48.3%44
17Jasmine PaoliniITA48.3%28
18Victoria MbokoCAN48.2%29
19Sorana CirsteaROU48.2%36
20Anna BondarHUN48.1%21
21Taylor TownsendUSA48.1%21
22Amanda AnisimovaUSA47.9%33
23Antonia RuzicCRO47.6%20
24Linda NoskovaCZE47.5%45
25Sara BejlekCZE47.4%22
26Maya JointAUS47.4%17
27Elena Gabriela RuseROU47.3%23
28Marta KostyukUKR47.0%40
29Leylah FernandezCAN47.0%35
30Madison KeysUSA46.8%39
31Ann LiUSA46.8%31
32Elisabetta CocciarettoITA46.8%19
33Elina SvitolinaUKR46.5%51
34McCartney KesslerUSA46.5%18
35Katerina SiniakovaCZE46.4%29
36Panna UdvardyHUN46.4%16
37Qinwen ZhengCHN46.3%22
38Shuai ZhangCHN46.3%24
39Jessica Bouzas ManeiroESP46.0%17
40Donna VekicCRO45.9%21
41Magda LinettePOL45.9%22
42Nikola BartunkovaCZE45.8%25
43Zeynep SonmezTUR45.7%27
44Peyton StearnsUSA45.6%27
45Liudmila Samsonova—45.6%36
46Cristina BucsaESP45.4%25
47Yulia PutintsevaKAZ45.4%21
48Anna Kalinskaya—45.1%40
49Ekaterina Alexandrova—45.1%34
50Renata ZarazuaMEX45.1%15

30 further qualified WTA players are outside the top 50; the full field is sortable in the WTA stat explorer on Stat Leaders.

How second-serve points won is measured

Second-serve points won is total points won behind a second serve divided by total second serves played, expressed as a percentage.

A player qualifies for this board with at least 15 singles matches in the 2026 pool and at least 15 of those matches carrying this statistic. The floor is half the busiest schedule on tour, capped at 15 — a flat 15 would leave the board empty until roughly April, when the pool has barely filled. The Matches column on every row is that player's own denominator, so a number taken over a thin sample is visible as one rather than hidden behind a rank. A tour section is withheld entirely below 25 qualified players.

Coverage and limits

Figures cover Grand Slam, 1000- and 500-level singles matches in 2026, on every surface. 250-level and lower-tier events are not counted, so a player's totals here run below their full-season numbers — which is also why this page ranks a per-match or per-point RATE rather than a season total. A total drawn from a partial pool would be wrong in a way a rate is not.

Second-serve splits share the same source as the first-serve splits, so the two boards draw on the same matches. In the 2026 pool this statistic is recorded for 2,958 of the 3,040 ATP matches (97%) and 2,922 of the 3,298 WTA matches (89%).

Ranks and values on this page are computed over the same pool, so the ordering and the numbers beside it always agree. Drop Shot is not the ATP or the WTA and these are not official tour statistics: they are aggregated from our own match feed, and where a match did not report a statistic it contributes nothing to either the numerator or the denominator.